ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been observed in patients with COVID-19 (1,2), suggesting that they may be associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke in severe cases (3). Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder and the most common form of acquired thrombophilia globally. At least one clinical criterion, vascular thrombosis (arterial, venous or microthrombosis) or pregnancy morbidity and at least one laboratory criterion- positive aPL two times at least 12 weeks apart: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (anti-β2GPI) antibody, have to be met for international APS classification criteria(4). Several reports also associate anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) with APS.ObjectivesTo combine clinical data on arterial/venous thrombosis and pregnancy complications before and during hospitalisation with aPL laboratory findings at 4 time points (hospital admission, worsening of COVID-19, hospital discharge, and follow-up) in patients with the most severe forms of COVID-19 infection.MethodsPatients with COVID-19 pneumonia were consequetively enrolled, as they were admitted to the General hospital Pancevo. Exclusion criteria were previous diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease and diagnosis of APS. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records. Laboratory results, including LA, aCL, anti-β2GPI, and aPS/PT antibodies were taken at hospital admission, worsening (defined as cytokine storm, connection of the patient to the respirator, use of the anti-IL-6 drug- Tocilizumab), at hospital discharge and at 3-months follow-up and sent to University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia for analysis. Statistics was performed by using SPSS 21.Results111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited;7 patients died during hospitalisation (none were aPL-positive on admission and at the time of worsening), 3 due to pulmonary artery embolism. All patients were treated according to a predefined protocol which included antibiotics, corticosteroids, anticoagulation therapy and specific comorbidity drugs;patients with hypoxia were supported with oxygen. During hospitalisation, pulmonary artery thrombosis occurred in 5 patients, one was aPL-positive at all time points (was diagnosed with APS), others were negative. In addition, 9/101 patients had a history of thrombosis (5 arterial thrombosis (coronary and cerebral arteries), none of whom was aPL-positive on admission and at follow-up, and 4 venous thrombosis, one of which was aPL-positive at all time points and received an APS diagnosis). Among 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, 55.6% were transiently positive at the time of discharge, compared to patients without prior thrombosis, in whom 26.1% were transiently positive at the hospital release (p=0.074). Two patients had a history of pregnancy complications (both had miscarriage after 10th week of gestation), but did not have aPL positivity at any time point.ConclusionAlthough aPL was expected to be associated with vascular disease in the most severe forms of COVID-19, all patients that have died in our cohort were aPL negative. At hospital discharge, 56% of patients with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis had positive aPL that became negative at the 3-months follow-up (were transienlty positive), which should be considered when prescribing therapy after hospitalisation.References[1]Trahtemberg U, Rottapel R, Dos Santos CC, et al. Anticardiolipin and other antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID-19 positive and negative patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2021;80:1236-1240.[2]Stelzer M, Henes J, Saur S. The Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23(9):72-4.[3]Xie Y, Wang X, Yang P, Zhang S. COVID-19 complicated by acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020: 2: e200067.[4]Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, et al. J.Thromb.Haemost. 2006;4: 295-306.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of nterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Background: Although Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) provides strong prognostic information of an unfavorable outcome in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), there is little information of its relevance as a biomarker for outcomes in COVID-19 and its complications Purpose: To evaluate the association of increased BNP levels with complications and in-hospital mortality in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Method(s): The study included COVID-19 patients with data on BNP levels included in the ISACS COVID-19 registry. The population was categorized according to the presence of peak BNP levels >=100 pg/mL during hospitalization. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, AHF or acute respiratory failure (ARF, defined as PiO2/FiO2<300 mmHg or need for mechanical ventilation). Calculations were conducted using age and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results were also stratified according to presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. Differences between subgroups were verified for statistical significance using test for interaction. Result(s): Of the 1152 patients included in the study, 615 (53.4%) had elevated BNP levels. These subjects were older (69.9+/-13.8 vs 59.1+/-16.8, p-value<0.001), had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors (82.9% vs 57.7%, p-value<0.001) and presented more frequently with a prior history of CVD (either ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation or a history of revascularization) (50.1% vs 27.5%, p-value<0.001). No sex differences were observed. When considering outcomes, BNP levels >=100 pg/mL were associated with increased rates of in-hospital mortality (32.9% vs 4.9%, p-value<0.001), even after adjustment for demographic characteristics (OR: 7.35;95% CI: 4.75-11.40;p-value<0.001). High BNP levels were also strongly associated with an increased risk of AHF (OR 19.9;95% CI 8.6-45.9;pvalue< 0.001), a correlation that persisted both in patients with and without a prior CVD history (p for interaction=0.29). Of note, patients with elevated BNP also had a higher likelihood of developing ARF (OR 2.7;95% CI 2.1- 3.6;p-value<0.001), even in absence of AHF (OR 3.00;95% CI 2.20-4.1;p-value<0.001). Conclusion(s): In COVID-19, blood BNP level not only appears to be predictor of in-hospital mortality and AHF but was also independently associated with an increased risk of ARF. This finding supports the routine use of BNP in all patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19, regardless of a prior history of CVD.
ABSTRACT
Introduction We evaluated the prevalence, aetiologies and antibiotic resistance patterns of bacterial infections in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. We also investigated comorbidities, risk factors, and the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients with bacterial infections. Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated medical records of 7249 randomly selected patients with COVID-19 admitted to three clinical centres between January 1 2021 and February 16, 2022. A total of 6478 COVID-19 patients met the eligibility criteria for analysis. Results The mean age of the patients with SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial infections was 68.6 ± 15.5 years (range: 24 to 94 years). The majority of patients (68.7%) were older than 65 years. The prevalence of bacterial infections among hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 12.9%, most of them being hospital-acquired (11.5%). Bloodstream (37.7%) and respiratory tract infections (25.6%) were the most common bacterial infections. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii caused 25.2% and 23.6% of all bacterial infections, respectively. Carbapenem-resistance in Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 72.6%, 93.7%, and 69.1%. Age >60 years and infections caused by ≥3 pathogens were significantly more prevalent among deceased patients compared to survivors (p<0.05). Furthermore, 95% of patients who were intubated developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The overall in-hospital mortality rate of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial infections was 51.6%, while 91.7% of patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation died. Conclusions Our results reveal a striking association between healthcare-associated bacterial infections as an important complication of COVID-19 and fatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with lymphopproliferative diseases (LPD) and covid-19 have poor outcome as consequence of inadequate humoral and cellular immunity due to the hematological disease itself but also due to the administered chemotherapy which further increases the risk of complications and mortality. Aims: The aim of this study is to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, the presence of comorbidities, laboratory parameters, disease status, as well as outcome of the patients with COVID-19 and lymphoproliferative disease and compare them with characteristics of covid-19 infection in patients from general population (GP). Methods: This is a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in the following 3 University centers in period from 15 March 2020 to 31 October 2021. The study included hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection: 161 patients with LPD and 162 patients from the GP. Statistical analysis included demographic statistics, the χ2 test, the Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier method for analysis of survival and multivariate logistic regression model for analysis of risk factors for mortality. Results: In the LPD group, there were 54 patients (33.54%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 72 patients (44.72%) with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL/HL) and 35 patients (21.74%) with multiple myeloma (MM). Ninety-six (59,63%) patients were on active treatment and 14(8.7%) patients were newly diagnosed. The LPD and GP group differed significantly in relation to age (66 vs. 54 years), gender (male: 60.2% vs. 75.3%), presence of comorbidities (109, 67.7% vs. 81, 50%) patients, covid score (mild 22.5% vs. 1.9%, moderate 80, 50.3% vs. 121, 74.7%), and severe/critical 44(27.1%) vs. 38(23.4%) patients. Group of patients with LPD had also significantly lower level of hemoglobin, lowest value of lymphocytes, platelets, higher level of CRP, ferritin, Ddimer (on admission and maximal values) and LDH with respect to group of patients from GP. Mortality rate was higher in LPD group of patients than in GP group (45, 28% vs. 26, 16%) patients. Among the LPD group, the highest mortality rate was observed in patients with MM (16, 45.71%) patients, followed by CLL (15, 27.9%) patients and NHL/HL group (14, 19.4%) patients. Independent factors related to survival are high value of D dimer, anemia (hemoglobin <100g/l) and moderate/critical COVID score in LPD group, while maximal value of CRP, anemia, leucocytosis and age (>60 years) in GP group. Summary/Conclusion: Our study showed significant difference in the characteristics and outcome in covid-19 between patients with LPD and patients from GP. Patients with LPD are older, they have significantly higher inflammatory parameters and more frequent presence of comorbidities compared to patients from GP. Independent factors related to survival in the LPD group are high values of D dimer, moderate/critical COVID score and anemia, while maximal values of CRP, anemia and older age are identified in the GP group.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aim. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global threat and a huge problem for our community. There are so many open questions. The aim of this study was to establish the frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in hospitalized patients with infection caused by this virus (coronavirus disease-19 – COVID-19), but also to compare if patients with GI symptoms have a higher computed tomography (CT) scan severity score of interstitial pneumonia (IP) compared to patients with COVID-19 without GI symptoms. Methods. Our database comprised 322 patients with COVID-19 who were divided into two groups, patients with and without GI symptoms. All information was taken from anamnestic data and patients’ history, followed by statistical analysis. Results. Thorax CT scans of 206 patients (63.9%) were described as bilateral IP, of which 76 CT scans (36.9%) were described by radiologists as the peak of infection. Moreover, 130 patients (40.4%) had GI symptoms, and even 58 out of 130 patients (44.6%) reported GI symptoms as the first manifestation of COVID-19 infection. The most commonly reported one was the lack of appetite (73 patients or 56.15%). Furthermore, 65 (50%) patients reported diarrhea, 25 (19.2%) patients reported nausea and vomiting, and 9 (6.9%) patients reported abdominal pain. In addition, among patients with bilateral IP and GI tract symptoms, 31 (40.79%) of them did not have a higher CT scan severity score at the peak of the disease compared to the patients without GI symptoms (45 of them or 59.2%), (p = 0.704). Conclusion. GI symptoms often are the first manifestation of COVID-19. Therefore, every patient with newly formed digestive tract symptoms should be tested for COVID-19. On the other hand, GI symptoms do not indicate COVID-19 patients will have a severe form of IP. © 2022 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Children mostly have mild or asymptomatic forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but during pandemic a higher incidence of Kawasaki disease, Kawasaki-like syndrome and the emergence of a new clinical entity, multisystem inflammatory post-covid syndrome (MIS-C) has also been observed. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine clinical features and laboratory findings in patients with MIS-C. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical features and laboratory findings of MIS-C patients treated at our tertiary referal center (Clinic of Pediatric, University Clinical Centre Nis, Serbia). Results: From 18th of March 2020 till 30st of April 2021 there were 10 patients diagnosed as MIS-C according to CDC criteria. Eight patients were male and two were female. Patients age was 2 to 13 years (average 7.9 years, median 7 years). All patients had SARS -CoV-2 N-protein IgG antibodies but without history of disease symptoms and had positive contact four weeks prior to the onset of MIS-C symptoms. First symptom of MIS-C was fever (over 38C) which lasted in average for 4.4 days (3-7 days). Muco-cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations were most common. All patients had bulbar conjuctivitis, rash was present in 8 patients (80%), hand/foot oedema in 6 cases (60%), anterior cervical lymphadenopathy and cheliitis in 4 cases (40%) and periobital oedema in one case (details presented in Table 1. Clinical features of MIS-C patients). Nine patients (90%) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms while nervous system was affected in 5 patients. Three patients developed heart insuffitiency and one patient developed early signs of right coronary arthery aneurism. All patients had elevated inflammatory markers. Complete blood count showed elevated levels of white blood cells in 9 patients. Hypoalbuminemia and hypoproteinemia, low levels of serum potassium and sodium were present during ten days after the onset of symptoms. Troponines were elevated in 4 cases, proBNP in 5 cases. Abdominal ultrasound was performed and 6 patients presented with hepatoplenomegaly, 3 with enlarged spleen, one with enlagred liver and 4 had ascites. All patients were treated with combination of two antibiotics till cultures were proven negative, corticosteroid therapy and antiaggregation therapy. Three patients received a IVIG in a single dose (2gr/kg). All patients had good response to corticosteroid therapy (2mg/kg). Corticosteroid therapy was continued for four weeks (tapering). Conclusion: MIS-C can be a life-threatening condition in children. Early diagnosis and timely adequate treatment are of paramount importance. In children less than 5 years of age, the distinction between Kawasaki (Kawasaki shock) syndrome and MIS-C might be difficult, influencing the decision to use IVIG or steroids alone.